Deconstruction, Dissonance and Imprinting

The absurdity of compelling improbabilities of the UFO phenomenon is perhaps a viral assertion that is akin to cellular biology wherein the entire somatic organization of a body is not simultaneously reoriented but rather, as an analogous biochemical process, this non linguistic communication, or information transfer is perhaps a phenomenon which transmits information cell by cell, witness by witness in a staged demonstration to transmute their inner organization, and then as a consequence, reorients the observer in relation to the observed.

It bypasses consensus and the anthropology of cultural institutions by direct insertion without an intermediary terminology either from itself or from a sanctioned institution with impunity.

In this we have an indirect purpose in this phenomena whose behavior is to present itself as demonstrative rather than purposeful, or is it? Does the mirrored surface of appearances contain a subtle discernment that has more to do with psychology than flight characteristics?

The serving of pancakes, the theft of fertilizer,the kidnapping of pigs, the near air collision, the intermittent toying with military facilities, the robots, blonde Venusians, gnomes and Reptilians divide, cube and square referents in the face of more compelling evidence as perhaps a tact that has a deeper psychological purpose that imposes itself by faux realities that interlock logic to an increasing state of disassociation. Between the rules of the game and the bypassing of any law we can assign to them, these chimera perform a surgical strike in the targeted realm of any consensus we can arrange as an ad hoc place marker. By inference, there is a territorial claim made upon the aggregate sum of what we consider possible although it's authorship is more concerned with the mind as a resource than mineral deposits or so it seems.

Perhaps this is the reason that we will never see a UFO land on the White House lawn or have tea with a delegation from Alpha Centuri as this phenomenon may represent a reorientation poised with intentional absurdities, that deconstruct certainty in a environment rife with it's polar opposite.It may play upon the trick we have played on ourselves by moving the boundaries of a cartography that is the only self referential raft we cling to as it sinks. An opportunistic shadow of our reference markers.

Fundamentalism in it's many formulations serves as a bulwark poised against uncertainty, and unpredictability. Historically,World War Two, the "red threat" of McCarthyism, the advent of thermonuclear annihilation, assassinations, the death of living systems that support life and the militarization of space all are a nexus, held in a hand of five plus decades that is an open door to unknown probabilities, and psychological tampering in a context of free floating anxiety beneath the surface of polite theorising. One can reasonably apply the term, superimposition, as this is the net effect upon history, when a new mythos is imprinted, staking a claim upon a cartography yet to be explored in physics, metaphysics or language itself. Is this a checkmate or a game of pawns?

If a base language of orientation is the reliance upon stereotype, predictability and semiotics, then we observe a process that while, in of itself, appears to be absurd, perhaps this is an intent rather than a phenomenon to be judged solely by it's wide spectrum of appearances. Perhaps the ground of consensus is being softened as the images in of themselves convey nothing other than a deconstructive reorientation of terms, in a language that has no precedent, whose psychological tact is based upon upending dualities into a maybe. A dissonance of cognition.

Perhaps it is a prelude... rather than an autonomous phenomenology.

If this is a psychological form of tampering and tempering, then no militarization of weaponry will suffice if a defensive stance is taken. It works within by distorting referents from without. Perhaps if this is so, the only available strategy would be for intelligence operatives to mount a counter psychological front, a ploy of reductionism in an organization composed of strict empiricists who would would propagandize against a axial reorientation of control wrested from governance.

Another may be to infer control by management through intentionally issuing straw dogs, obvious fallacies that foster the impression that something is in their possession that infers control when it perhaps a game of inflatable tanks, mannequins and camouflage that vouchsafes that this particular emperor of the phenomenon, in reality, has no clothes.

If this phenomenon is a many dimensioned exercise in tampering, then the above is simply a stop gap, a bucket with more holes than any "real" materiality.

The silent majority is well aware of what goes bump in the night and in the peripheral vision of culture, regardless of any sophistry one could append reality with, as a late arriving post it note.

The game is afoot.