Wallowing in Our Crapulence *
This is written by Jedi Warrior - Mike Good. Hopefully I will have his blogging account fixed soon. Read on:
Oh dear, what’s become of my beloved UFOlogy? It seems like a cross between All Star Wrestling and a twisted version of the Keystone Cops, where the protagonists take themselves so freakin’ seriously that they completely miss the point that it is actually slapstick comic theater. It is like a preposterous shooting gallery where the only visible targets are brightly displayed on the shooter’s own feet. It is like a three ring circus freak show, sans ringmaster.
Would you like some proof?
Well, first you have your amateurish hoaxes like SERPO and Billy Meir’s laughable photographic imagery. After that you have your objective truths, like Roswell and Stan Romanek. Then there is the blatantly hallucinatory, like the Face on Mars and crop circles. What about the almost clever but too good to be true fabrications like MJ-12? Then we have the extremely clever but too good to be true fabrications like the Isaac/drone mess. And of course, we swoon with the truly psychotic spurious fear-mongering of David Icke, and his ilk, warning us about evil reptilian leaders bent on global domination and dining on, not just lady fingers, but whole entire ladies and gentlemen as well.
Let’s not forget the megalomaniacal paranoid ranting of narcissistic pathological liars like William Cooper or Phil Schneider, or the merely pathetic narcissistic pathological lying of people like Dan Burisch. How about the credulous uncritical sycophants who actually believe their bilge? Then there are their diametric counterparts, the fascist “skeptics” who don’t believe in anything but their own intellectual superiority. Next are the rational materialist UFOlogists, with their slide rules and micrometers, insisting on the nuts and bolts reality of UFOs, despite the utter absence of nuts and bolts. And how about those squabbling children, the abduction researchers, bickering about whether aliens are evil trolls or misunderstood alien hippie love muffins?
Is that enough for you?
Hell, I was just getting started. But you are probably already bristling about at least some of my characterizations. If you are, then you are making my point for me. Thanks. You guys rock.
UFOlogy is a wannabe study. It is a disorganized pile of subjective data, some probable, some bogus, that we UFO nuts utilize to flesh out our individual subjective prejudices. We each dip into this eclectic, discombobulated stew of collective consciousness to fill our mind bowls with whatever crap we think we can stomach. Then we go to the pages of this magazine, the cyberspace message boards or to cheesy UFO conferences and get into pugilistic fisticuffs about whose crap tastes better.
Um, yeah, so that is why I write about this stuff.
Confessions of a UFO Philosopher
Well, now that I have alienated nearly everybody, the four of you left reading this can begin to discern my point. If the above rant upset you, it is because I took strong points on each of the subjects I mentioned. If you are mad at me, it is because the strong points I took differ from your own. It is possible for you to take any one of three positions on each of those subjects: believe, disbelieve, or choose not to decide.
If you stand outside of the UFOlogical three ring circus for a moment, you will recognize that nobody making those claims has a monopoly on the truth. In fact, if you are looking for truth, you will find it as elusive as compassionate conservatism. That is because truth is relative. You can only recognize “truth” through your personal consciousness. And you can mold your consciousness pretty much any way you like. We all do.
So, isn’t there an objective truth? Sure: Somebody really did kill John F. Kennedy. It wasn’t Lee Harvey Oswald. Only uncritical, brainwashed bubble heads believe that. But, at this point, we cannot directly witness that objective truth. We can only reconstruct an abstract substitute version of what we think the truth might be from this distant point in space and time, and more importantly, in our subjective consciousness. That means that the ultimate truth is probably unknowable and whatever subjective “truth” we choose to believe is just that: a choice.
Even a direct experience is open to interpretation and subject to the vagaries of your conscious mindset. Do you think that if Phil Klass saw a UFO, he would define it as such? That is why truth is relative. And that is why choosing to believe or disbelieve anything pertaining to UFOs is a crapshoot. Believing or disbelieving any of this stuff is taking potshots at a target skillfully placed on your own foot. It is a willful act of self-generated ignorance.
Oh lordy, so now that there are only two of you left reading this, you diehards may like to know my point is this: the only intellectually tenable position to take is, choose not to decide. Once you get there, you are no longer a UFOlogist but a UFO philosopher.
Decrapulating and Rebooting
The upside of all this, is that you no longer have to participate in those pointless debates about whose theory is better. That’s because choosing not to decide is the best theory of all. It prevents you from being wrong. It prevents you from having to reconfigure your less than accurate belief systems once new evidence presents itself. It prevents you from denying evidence that does not fit your subjective prejudices. It prevents those painful perforations in your foot.
The most important question we can ask regarding the UFO phenomenon is: What the hell is it? Unfortunately, we operate at a decided disadvantage because we are still trying to work out what reality is. Conventional wisdom portrays reality as a huge assemblage of billiard ball particles having an accidental party that, just by some inexplicable stroke of luck, spontaneously created itself. No magic, no rhyme or reason, just chemicals and billiard balls doing their thing.
But quantum physics tell us differently: quantum reality is a universe completely foreign from Newtonian ideas of atomic particles, gravity, light speed and the concept of an objective reality existing outside and separately from our conscious experience. Quantum data suggest matter is only a transitory phenomenon riding on the crest of a wave of generative consciousness.
Our supposedly “external” reality is as erroneous as Donald Trump's hair-do. We cannot have aliens, UFOs or even Donald Trumps without our conscious minds informing, actualizing, cogitating, sublimating and recreating them again. The "out there" suddenly becomes "in here". Our concept of reality becomes inside out. Ultimately, the only reality you can know is the one that flows like an experiential river, through your senses and between your ears.
So, when we try to put clothes on our UFOs or aliens, try to decide who they are and what they do, we are only participating in a fantasy game of "dress-up". We give them self generated disguises, imaginary outlines, and visionary hallucinatory obfuscations that we like to think explain them. Then like little Jack Horner, we pat ourselves on the back for being so darned clever.
Baloney. Matter is not some dead, external "stuff" that exists in an objective “out there”. It is malleable clay that we mold into whatever our collective consciousness, our consensus thinking disposes for us. What the hell is it? Nobody - and this means you – knows.
Cool! Now that it is just you and me, we can get down to the real point of this article. Since it’s just the two of us, would you like some ice cream? I am buying. You do believe in ice cream, don’t you?
* Thanks to Simpsons character, Montgomery Burns, for the title to this article.





Reader Comments (10)
Lesley.....That, my dear, was a beautiful, beautiful thing. And yes. I will believe in ice cream long enough to have some if not be some.
Gate, Gate, Para gate, Para san gate, Bodhi Svaha...
~Erik~
No, it is Mike's. When I said posting for -- I meant literally posting for. Maybe I need to change the wording.
Ah! I'm a dim bulb at times. Mike.....that is a beautif.......You know what I'm gonna say. Thanks!
Thank you too, Lesley!
~Erik~
Yeah Erik, it is my crazy scrawling here. Thanks! I owe you one ice cream.
Hopefully we can get my computer once again communicating with this blog. And Lesley, thanks so much for posting this for me. I never thought of myself as a Jedi Warrior, I see myself more as a Cosmic Curmudgeon.
Thanks for that too!
Cheers!!
Mike
Even Yoda could be described as curmudgeonly. Attitude with panache and style is a good thing and you wear it well. Chin up,my Zen friend. Together we can philosophize this whole matter into a endless tizzy of speculative derring do. Great fun. And that is key. Fun.....don't forget that.
~Erik~
Thanks Erik! Please do not think my chin is sagging in any way. I am keeping my curmudgeonly head held high. It is only those poor folks who fail to understand the symbolism in this essay that may find their chins dropping.
In a world where material reality is not actually real, all is metaphor. My personal belief is that UFOlogy is an appropriate metaphor for reality itself. The difference being that we mostly all agree the UFO is something more ambiguous than, say, ice cream.
Which brings me to a wonderful quote by Ram Dass: "Life is like ice cream, you have to eat it quickly, because it melts."
Mike
Yes, but in the case of ice cream.......ignorance is bliss. Now point me to the beer and chocolate and chips and salsa.
bliss bliss bliss bliss bliss...............
I was strangley spellbound by your article, and most would think I would have been one of the first to close the window, and move on to read something more geared towards positive UFology. But is there such a thing? I agree many in the UFology community are duking it out, I'm affraid I'm among those folks who are fighting. What am I fighting for? For the right to have an opinion, to voice it, and not be called a Liar... for what I have witnessed, what my husband has witnessed and experienced.I want to retain my right to battle the naysayers, the debunkers, the fear mongerers, etc. Trust me when I say this ignorance isn't bliss...understanding is bliss, love is bliss, acceptance is bliss, compassion is bliss!! Ignorance is ignorance!
I like Rocky Road ice cream, just so you know. Like UFology, the chocolate is the feel good aspect of it, the comradary of other experiencers, the knowing you are not alone. The Nuts, there are quite a few nuts out there, but that's what makes UFology interesting and frustrating as well. The marshmallow goo, well I think that is all of the self proclaimed researchers who are in all actuality debunkers. The ice cream when you get past all of the goodies added in, is the real gem of the bucket, that is what hold all of the goodness toghether. Is it the bloggers who rant their opinions? Is it the Organizations that set up the conferences? Is it the researchers who work hard to actually investigate and reasure the experiencers? Is it the radio hosts, or the TV personalities who continue to giggle at UFology in general? Is it the journalists who report sightings in newspapers? Is it the spouses who continue to support their abductee spouse because they know what their personal truths are? YES, it is all the above. The idea is that if you don't like strawberry ice cream...eat it only if you like it. If my Rocky Road, has to much added distractions that take away from the ice cream... eat it anyway, it's free :)
And it really doesn't matter if you believe or not, what matters is that you recognize that we al only human, and humans are curios beings... we want there to be life elsewhere...We already have five races of peple here on this planet, what would a few more hurt?
I know this wasn't exactly the point of your response, Lisa, but I felt compelled to mention it anyway.
I prefer to think of us as one race as opposed to five separate races -- but for the sake of argument, let's go with the ideas of five races: 'Race' (in the context of geographic, features, or ancestry) is usually a sub-categorization of homo-sapiens. In that case, 'A few more races' would require those visitors to first be human (or homo-sapien) and second to be 'insert imaginary race-name here'. Yeah, I'm splitting hairs in a way, because I do know what you meant, but use of the word 'race' always makes me twitch because race is not a cut and dry concept, but one that changes depending on your perspective (i.e. what Americans might consider 'race' to be, may differ from what another country or culture might define race as).
OK, now back to UFO crap:
I agree with Mike in that choosing a side is a pretty poor idea. No one really knows, which is what so many opinions somewhat valid, because in most cases when dealing with the unknown, one person's theory is probably as good as another's. The thing splitting much of the UFO 'community', a term I use very lightly, is the total acceptance of one idea over another, or those in support of cases that seem less than credible (that wasn't a jab).
We can all choose who to tune in and tune out, a fact we tend to ignore out of our inherent need to irritate ourselves. The higher-ranked members of the Ufological echelon don't like to be associated with what they consider the lower-rung swingers. Of course, the ideas backing those labels aren't set in stone as they are seen differently from opposite sides of the coin.
While I'm all for serious research, I don't have any misconceptions that this is a productively researched field. I don't know that we can research Ufology productively with our current knowledge of the sciences and available tools, which, as Mike pointed out, leads a few of us into the realm of UFO Philosophy (but lets not call it Ufolosophy).
And screw ice-cream. Give me a back of chips and I'm ready to Rock-n-Roll =)
I was going wtith the ice cream to get along with the guys, but now that you are here Deidre, you get the chips and I'll get the beer :) and I'll meet ya in the housewives lounge :)
I hear what you're saying about race,and I agree we are all one race in the humaniod sense, but what if...just what if ETs are real, and they are humanoid with DNA that is similar to ours...will we accept them as our race or to with become racists and deny them?
As for productivly researchered field by scientist, there are a few cases that have had science done, but the trick is to not let them know what they are looking at or where it came from! Then they can do research that is not biased!
This is an interesting conversation. It is nice to have unbiased (ha ha ha) no side choosing people to talk to :)